<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>danielmiessler.com - Latest Comments in A Three-Dimensional Approach to Organizing Feeds in Google Reader [v2]</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/</link><description>https://danielmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://drm.disqus.com/a_three_dimensional_approach_to_organizing_feeds_in_google_reader_v2/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:40:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Three-Dimensional Approach to Organizing Feeds in Google Reader [v2]</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/a-three-dimensional-approach-to-organizing-feeds-in-google-reader-v2#comment-11175505</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been doing this for awhile (although I simplify with folders named 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and then the categories.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are only a few feeds that I break off into more than one category though. I used to have more in multiple slots but the "item counts" can be a bit overwhelming when you do that (ie: 25 items from one source gets listed in more than one folder and it appears that you have a mountain of feeds to catch up on.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tend to star alot of things and then come back to them later. I'm hoping that Google refines the starred item search/sort just a little more and then Reader will be perfect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>