<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>danielmiessler.com - Latest Comments in Capturing Traffic Once and Making That Traffic Available to Multiple Tools</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/</link><description>https://danielmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://drm.disqus.com/capturing_traffic_once_and_making_that_traffic_available_to_multiple_tools/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:56:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Capturing Traffic Once and Making That Traffic Available to Multiple Tools</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/capturing-traffic-once-and-making-that-traffic-available-to-multiple-tools#comment-11181376</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think OmniPeek is a good example of what you are describing.  It supports a plugin API, and there are lots of plugins available from the WildPackets website.  WildPackets also provides tools to load packets into a database.   From there, lots of other applications can use the data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spacepacket</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:56:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Capturing Traffic Once and Making That Traffic Available to Multiple Tools</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/capturing-traffic-once-and-making-that-traffic-available-to-multiple-tools#comment-11181374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Adrian: I can't believe I had Elton John. FAIL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Miessler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:56:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Capturing Traffic Once and Making That Traffic Available to Multiple Tools</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/capturing-traffic-once-and-making-that-traffic-available-to-multiple-tools#comment-11181373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that was a good post on Richard's blog - it's a concept that everyone wants, but the implementation may get slightly tricky.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just on Richard Bejtlich's stuff - I feel the need to point out that perhaps you're overlooking the power of session data. In fact that's one of the big things I learnt after reading one of his books. I used to think of network capture mainly in terms of full-content capture; now I think that session data alone, is highly underrated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ghost16825</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Capturing Traffic Once and Making That Traffic Available to Multiple Tools</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/capturing-traffic-once-and-making-that-traffic-available-to-multiple-tools#comment-11181368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you may want John Lennon rather than Elton John for your Imagine reference...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We already have tcpdump and the .pcap file format for much of what you want in this post - except for the last section which sounds like you've taken your .pcap data, parsed it and dumped the results into a database. Not too hard to do - but could certainly be interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lots of data crosses most networks; how much of fit can we really keep?  Hard drives are getting cheaper - but not that cheap!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian Bool</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:39:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>