-
Website
http://danielmiessler.com/ -
Original page
http://danielmiessler.com/blog/curiosity-is-the-receptor-understanding-is-the-stimuli -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
'Dapo Osewa
3 comments · 1 points
-
Maxo
18 comments · 2 points
-
cooperati
127 comments · 2 points
-
dapxin
14 comments · 1 points
-
icepyro
3 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Free Will and Punishment
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Broadband Speeds Around the World
3 days ago · 2 comments
-
Willpower: A Limited Resource
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Availability Bias
5 days ago · 1 comment
-
Andrew Gelman Talks Voting Patterns and Income
5 days ago · 1 comment
-
Free Will and Punishment
I have to disagree with this. The more questions floating around in ones head the more likely they are to not generate questions based on their immediate observations. Effectively, too many questions results in too much noise and not enough room for signal. As a result, very little ends up being harvested. Instead the most likely result is "knowledge" produced inside their mind rather than by exposure to day to day experiences. Self made knowledge is often inaccurate without the test of reality. If you have a million questions already in your head, and they fill your thoughts, you'll completely miss the opportunities to harvest knowledge from your day to day.
I argue that in order to most benefit from day to day exposure to data one must be able to generate questions quickly on the spot and at the time of exposure. Going around with a head full of questions is likely to be a major distraction as it's inherently related to things not in front of you.
It's good to keep the "pump primed" so to speak, but I think the definition of curiosity is to generate questions quickly based on observation, not to have them pre-fetched.
Sorry, now that I've had the chance to reread this post, I mis-spoke when saying we were in disagreement. And the notion of having all of the questions already formed up in your head was clearly a figment of that prior misreading. Not sure wth I was doing at the time, or if I was interrupted between reading and replying, but clearly I ended up on some alternate conversation.
I agree with the question part. In fact this post stimulated a train of thought. Apart from curiosity I think the ability to dream wild (improbable) dreams and set visions is one of the most effective ways of creating something original. I think many people, myself included, tend to censor ideas and visions that seem impossible. Something impossible is usually something you don't know how to solve, or something you don't have an answer to, not something that's truly impossible (what is truly impossible?). This way you're limiting yourself to your comfort zone and don't stretch yourself enough.