http://drm.disqus.com/https://danielmiessler.com/about/enMon, 19 Feb 2007 23:51:20 -0000http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/fun-with-numbers#comment-11155710<p>I think I agree. There's probably some shred of real information here, but the 8 and 9 are so obvious.</p>Daniel MiesslerMon, 19 Feb 2007 23:51:20 -0000http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/fun-with-numbers#comment-11155708<p>Donno about that, looks a bit like the drawn numbers were drawn to fit the theory rather to prove it. Look at 7, 8, 9 and 2.</p><p>Sorry, personally I don't buy it. Take a look at older numerals in <a href="http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn/Mathematics.html#Ancient" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn/Mathematics.html#Ancient">http://www.skypoint.com/~wa...</a></p><p>Also, since the Arabs invented the modern day Algebra and the zero, you'd think their numbers are the "originals" Arabic numerals. No angles there. Take a look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_numerals">http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...</a></p><p>-- Arik</p>ArikMon, 19 Feb 2007 23:47:44 -0000