<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>danielmiessler.com - Latest Comments in How Responsive Is The New Setup?</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/</link><description>https://danielmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://drm.disqus.com/how_responsive_is_the_new_setup/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:50:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Responsive Is The New Setup?</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/how-responsive-is-the-new-setup#comment-11151253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right now it seems to be about the same, but I think you should write a kick-ass post and get digged (or regedditted) to give it a true stress test.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Responsive Is The New Setup?</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/how-responsive-is-the-new-setup#comment-11151251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From a totally unscientific POV, it seems faster, and slightly more responsive, but then again it may only be a psychosomatic impression...want me to hammer away and "test" it? :O&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael S Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:05:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>