<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>danielmiessler.com - Latest Comments in Religious Influence</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/</link><description>https://danielmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://drm.disqus.com/religious_influence/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:44:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Religious Influence</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/religious-influence#comment-11139883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;scary thing is that that "handful" of fundimentalists currently makes up the voterbase that is best organized when it comes to elections and putting people in power.  Additionally they tend to be vocal with thier dollars as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Ormes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:44:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Religious Influence</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/religious-influence#comment-11139882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;um thats not news... doesn't science always do that? That is the natural differences in science and religion... fact or well found theory vs. faith with fragmented historical data tied to big lies.. oh well not surprising at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charlie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:33:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>