<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>danielmiessler.com - Latest Comments in Security + Language = Shibboleth</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/</link><description>https://danielmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://drm.disqus.com/security_language_shibboleth/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:46:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Security + Language = Shibboleth</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/security-language-shibboleth#comment-11154795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I learned about another practical instance of this when I was learning Dutch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is a famous beach near The Hague ( Den Haag or des Gravenhage, has 'twas known in days of yore ) called Scheveningen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The syllable of that Sch is unique to Dutch, it's a rolling gutteral and is &lt;em&gt;markedly&lt;/em&gt; different from the Sch sound in German ( which is like Sh in the English word Sheep ).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thus, similar to the WW reference above, Scheveningen was a shibboleth during WWII to identify Germans from Dutchmen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Being a studious-minded guy I managed to get the phoneme before my departure.  It really gets the ol' Vollmer bone buzzing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven G. Harms</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:46:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security + Language = Shibboleth</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/security-language-shibboleth#comment-11154793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point -- fixed now. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Miessler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:08:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security + Language = Shibboleth</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/security-language-shibboleth#comment-11154791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"...and based on the response you can tell whether the person is part of the secret club or not..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it's more specific to say, "based on the &lt;i&gt;delivery&lt;/i&gt; of the response."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Powell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security + Language = Shibboleth</title><link>http://https://danielmiessler.com/blog/security-language-shibboleth#comment-11154789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This was used in an episode of west wing to determine if someone was faking a religion or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:18:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>