<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>danielmiessler.com - Latest Comments in The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/</link><description>https://danielmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://drm.disqus.com/the_best_retort_for_the_8220atheists_are_arrogant8221_argument/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 01:10:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-542885920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're an idiot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Separatethread</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 01:10:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-423452191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think I was being arrogant for saying I was an atheist. I mean, I don't actually know for certain that a higher power does not exist. However, I do strongly believe that we are "alone" as it were. I am not going to identity as an agnostic just because some Christians think that I am being close-minded, prideful, arrogant, stubborn, stupid, foolish or whatever else. One Christian told me that atheists only exist to be as arrogant as we feel they are, so that we can shout at the religious fanatics we oppose. They think that we purposefully take an extreme, polar opposite stand just so that we can laugh in their faces and ridicule them. That position in itself shows that it was that individual, not myself, who was truly arrogant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:47:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-358006087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Atheism is another ism...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not true. "ism" is a suffix used for uncountable nouns to indicate adherence to a political or religious ideology. Atheism, however, is not an ideology, but simply a label with a negative connotation given by religious believers to people who do not have a religion or believe in a god.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaap Winius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:24:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-278120503</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quite possibly evidence of something as defined by someone. Therefore without firsthand knowledge of the actual situation, people fill in the blanks. LOTS of blanks, with well, whatever suits them. therefore the ultimate truth may never be known, so by default everyone should be agnostic until the theory can be proven.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:45:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-265928694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So what you are saying is that having knowledge is arrogant. And that studying and finding the irrefutable truth claims of the Bible should just be ignored. Well I don't know about you but I am glad that not all peoples adhere to this odd philosophy. On the other hand it is VERY interesting that you (atheists) want to indite those who believe in the miracle of creation when all those who believe in evolution (macro) also believe in miracles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Barrow and Frank Tipler in their book “The Anthropic Cosmological Principle” list 10 steps in the course of human evolution. Each of which is so improbable that before it would occur the Sun would have ceased to be a main sequence star and incinerated the earth. And they calculate the probability of the evolution of the human genome to be somewhere between 4 to the -180th power to the 110,000 power and 4 to the -360th power to the 110,000 power. So if evolution (macro) did occur on this planet it was literally a miracle and therefore evidence for the existence of God.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eznight</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-228711444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mutation is random. Selection is absolutely not random.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JB Bell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-228102320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;natural selection is random&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-162904380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So you don't believe in any gods, but you don't believe there are no gods?&lt;br&gt;If so, guess what, you're an atheist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:36:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-162903846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, Agnosticism is separate from atheism. Agnosticism/gosticism deals with what you know or claim to know. Atheism/theism deals with what you believe. Most atheists (myself included) are agnostics. Most atheists admit they might be wrong, and a god might exist.&lt;br&gt;You don't get that from most theists, they all "know" they are right, even though they have no evidence on their side.&lt;br&gt;Also, I know I am right God (as defined by the Bible) does not exist, as he is an impossible being. He must be jealous, while never being jealous.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:35:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-65327962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What makes atheists arrogant is that they absolutely know they're right.  If they didn't, they'd be agnostic ~ but they're far too caught up "disproving" religion to admit that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reroko</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-51193637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy cr**. Have you just told what that person is or believes by just reading a two line comment? You're like the best analyst ever. Kudos to you, pal!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thiago</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-51142263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way to be Exhibit A for the atheist side.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LSD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-51135479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mean you're a moron who doesn't know that agnosticism and atheism are not mutually exclusive, and that you are actually an agnostic atheist, because you don't claim belief in any said particular faith?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keep on chuggin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CHB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-51133732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome sauce, but I would also include the assumption that a believer knows the gender of the "Creator" or that such an all powerful being would even have a gender.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CharlieChaplin2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:11:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-51128401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Richard&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So where's this anti-god we're supposed to be worshiping now? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:15:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-51127020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there's some elements of arrogance to both sides.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm more agnostic (traditional definition) than anything else though&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jane Stenson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:00:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Iv had this conversation once or 2ice... Its not that atheists think their arrogant, its that the have a deep rooted belief in ignorance, that they need to defend. Just like every other religion, in order to have an answer to something that is far beyond the cutting edge of understanding. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Atheism is another ism.. Isms and anitys = the acceptance of ignorance. As ironic as it sounds they hey have staunch devotion to their God, which is an anti-God which is just as real as anti-matter. Still, I contend that all religious zelots have denied themselves one of the most fundamental rights of humanity; the ability to imagine and then pursue factual answers. Yeah I suppose its arrogant to believe you have the answer to something that you cant possibly understand... so in that respect..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Corsale</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:16:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When a person suffers a delusion, it's called insanity. When a group suffers the same delusion, it becomes a Religion. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It continually amuses me to see how all theists seem so offended by us Atheists. It also interests me to see how you take it so personally that there is a group out there that does not believe in your god, or indeed any god at all. Does anybody understand that the monotheistic religions are just a god for a few away from being Atheists?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:37:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;God phoned me last night and told me he doesn't exist. I'm not one to argue...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Quiet agnostic</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure where I read it (or something close):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"A cult is just religion without any political power."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And when the fundy's come a knockin' on my door I ask them if they believe in any other gods.  when they say no I then say we are really not to much different since just believe in one less god than you.&lt;br&gt;(I think Dawkins has a quote that inspired this).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LoudPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Works for me!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:27:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;“And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” - Bertrand Russell&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Gardner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Dave ...  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;.. but I still don't see that great a number of people who both (1) believe that they know the mind of God and (2) assert that atheists are arrogant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... Perhaps I could have kept it that simply stated the first time.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carl M</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:31:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Atheist Group hug…and a snack, and off to bed...none the wiser...but perhaps more contently ignorant...aww&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karl Jr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:36:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Retort for the &amp;#8220;Atheists Are Arrogant&amp;#8221; Argument</title><link>https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-best-retort-for-the-atheists-are-arrogant-argument#comment-11200134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Atheist Group hug...and a snack, and off to bed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karl Jr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>