danielmiessler.com - Latest Comments in The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

H.P. Loathecraft — Thu, 05 May 2011 16:25:15 -0000

And the anthrax attacks

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Jim — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:08:45 -0000

The FBI has been covering up for the real perpetrators of 9-11 since the attacks took place. They seized evidence at both the Pentagon and World Trade Center which the Bureau continues to withhold from the public.

The FBI still maintains more than 80 videotapes it confiscated from the Pentagon and surrounding areas on 9-11, yet has refused to share them with the public. The FBI has also claimed that it never recovered three of the flight data recorders from the planes that hit the World Trade Center Towers on 9-11, even though two men - Nick Dimassi and Mike Bellone saw the flight recorders in the back of an ATV at the crash site.

The FBI has told so many lies in regard to the 9-11 cover up that the Bureau must be seen as complicit in this conspiracy, as are three branches of the U.S. Federal government and the media in this country.

As for the FBI's ability to fabricate evidence, the Bureau has a history of doing so, including its most comprehesive fraud to date - the faulty fuel tank theory on TWA Flight 800.

Take this into account with the fact that the FBI has never had a legislative charter in which to operate in the United States (So how can the FBI operating at all?) and we have an organization so plagued by its own scandals that it must be abolished.

Jim

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Skulls_ahoy — Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:17:40 -0000

Excuse me guys PLEASE READ
i want to clear a few things up, everyone here seems to be intelligent enough for me to be able just to say a few things to you.
Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11, seriously a man in a mountain with all this technology can;t be found, are you crazy? He works for the american government, is well looked after and happily paid, thats it, if he was this real terrorist do you think the United Kingdom would let his son in this country for a holiday?
on 9/11 there is so much evidence that it was a job of the military, unfortunateluy for them they couldnt cover it up as good as they wanted, if you look at the Pentagon where it was hit, does anyone have any idea how low the Pentagon is? its only a few hundred metres high, now think about it guys, if you have a plane over your house thousands of metres away it is sooooooo loud, and there were no witnesses for this crash into the Pentagon?
Americans are good hearted people and i really feel sorry for them, and feel sorry for all the good hearted innocent muslims out there.
Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, and the plan is to GET RID OF ISLAM, why? because it promotes world peace, now what kinda government would want everyone living together in world peace and feed the poor?
Now, as for blaming some poor innocent saudi's, what a disgrace, no evidence available as everything burnt down apart from a passport! come on thats not fair now is it, i can go on and on about the weak evidence, even the way the building fell down- demolition, and i was 13 when that happened and it was sooooooo fake.
I advise everyone to read about whats happened after all this media coverage, look at the poor innocent people or Iraq, all those children and more than a MILLION widows, that means americans have to of killed a minimum of 350 MEN A DAY!! MURDER is what you call this! all for oil and now look at Afghanistan, oh and where were those weapons of mass destruction? in saddams back garden? cos i havent seen them, and now they are starting with Iran, basically i can go on and on about different things, please just be logical and use your common sense and dont let this media brainwash you and make you believe what they want you to while murder is being commited under your noses.
peace to everyone and you can email me on skulls_ahoy@hotmail.com if you wana ask me anything,

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

American TI — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:04:36 -0000

The FBI can't link Bin Ladin to the attacks on 9-11 because Bin Laden had nothing to do with the attacks on 9-11. These attacks were a very well planned false flag operation which were the brainchild of the Zionist think tank, the Project For A New American Century.

See Richard Behan's The Fraudulent War On Terror, an Ebook which can be found through Google and downloaded for free to your computer. It describes the PNAC's desire to break the contract between the Taliban and Argentina, to build the TransAfghanistan oil pipeline from the Capsian Basin to Asia. When the PNAC controlled Bush Adminstration failed to do so, they plotted (with the help of the U.S. Military Industrial Intelligence complex) the false flag operation which became 9-11. And which has resulted in a vicious and unprovoked attack on Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the deliberate destruction of the Constitutional rule of law within the United States.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

LORD REV YAHWEH — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:38:53 -0000

THERE ARE A BUNCH OF ZIONISTS SATANIC TERRORISTS IN OUR GOVERNMENT AND IN GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD AND WE MUST STOP THESE DRACONIAN MEASURES NOW

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

LORD REV DYJUAN D BARNES YAHWE — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:40:09 -0000

9-11 was a false flag terror operation and none of the alleged terror groups have had anything to do with it

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

LORD REV DYJUAN D BARNES YAHWE — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:38:36 -0000

911 was carried out by the american government and the conspitors which helped to pull off 911 and are helping to implement the draconian steps we must stop the alpha draconians now

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

alzimir de souza carvalho — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:17:09 -0000

ternado para missões de policias en segredo oficial....

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Neville — Mon, 12 May 2008 10:56:21 -0000

Bin Laden was on the FBI's most wanted list for the USS Cole and the embassy bombing in Africa before 9/11. I remenber looking on the FBI's website during the summer of 2001 and seeing him there.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

John — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:12:10 -0000

Hi, there!..3e4816208b04bc773fe07a8daf8fe7c5

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Karin Friedemann — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:00:48 -0000

Bin Laden is not known to have any connection with 9/11. The videos where he allegedly confessed were proven by German to have been falsely translated by US "intelligence". I LOVE the story about the passport that flew out of the plane and landed on the street in New York, and the one about the alleged suicide bomber that started a letter, "In the Name of God, my family, and myself" was clearly a method to sort the retards from the normal people.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

pat l — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:31:35 -0000

USAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) for our guidance. I am thankful to the Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).

I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti-Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Roxy — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:09:13 -0000

Of course bin Laden had nothing to do with it. That tape they showed of some guy gloating over it was not bin Laden, and that was so obvious, it was laughable. How much longer is everyone going to continue to pretend like our government had nothing to do with 9-11?

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Michael McCullough — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:11:14 -0000

Why is that so hard for some people to comprehend? Do you not get that they hate us?
It's called Bush Derangement Syndrome. Anything bad that has happened in the last 75 has to be blamed on Bush. Does everyone believe that Saddam Hussein was no threat to us? Go check out documents released by the government and translated by -- not the New York Times or the Washington Post -- but by bloggers. Does everyone believe that Bush made up the evidence needed to go to war with Iraq? Read what the Democrats were saying the 1990s. Do the Bush Haters know that Clinton signed into law in 1998 a bill to overthrow Saddam? Do you think that the media is lying to you? Well, you're right, but not in the way you think they are. Check out AP's use of a photographer with strong terrorist ties. AP has also used people with terrorist ties to do their reporting for them. One of AP's reporters operates an anti-Israel blog. The BBC fired an editor for using fake photos from Iraq. And how can we forget the fake photos used by Reuters. How many of you Bush-haters know about the recent phony story in the liberal magazine The National Review? I'll bet that most of you believe the myth that the rich pay less taxes due to Bush's tax cut. I'll also bet that most of you aren't smart enough to figure out this IRS chart showing that the wealthiest 1% of Americans paid 29.01% of the country's income taxes in 1994 but paid 36.89% of the income taxes in 2004. That's right, the rich pay MORE in taxes now than they did under Clinton.
Bush hasn't done everything right. But he does not deserve the scorn concocted by the Democrats and the mainsream. It's obvious from reading some of the comments here that many of you have no concept of history, cannot remember anything that happened before yesterday, and believe anything that nutjobs (like the 9/11 Truthers) say about Bush. We have soldiers fighting in the Middle East for your right to be stupid.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Peaceful Lion — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:24:22 -0000

Are you kidding me? Ask the FBI if Saddam has any connection and see what they say...

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Sasha Leiter — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:10:45 -0000

"WOW… ok.. simple test here… go to the FBI’s most wanted list… and walah! our dear Mr Bin is definitely on that list… BUT…. look at what he is wanted for… any mention of 9/11 or planes or buildings? didn’t think so…. come now people lets all grow up…." Considering the FBI is a government controlled group who would have had to take part in the conspiracy and cover-up, don't you think that they wouldn't be the ones to subtly expose the thing? This isn't complicated. He LEADS the group that did it. When people talk about how catching Bin Laden won't make a difference, it's because he doesn't control everything in the organization and directly help everyone pull off every attack. He does however lead the group that launched the attack. That's why he's wanted. You're just thinking about this in a really biased manner, because you're specifically looking for proof that 9/11 wasn't caused by him. When you look at this from any sort of reasoned perspective, it's blatantly obvious what this actually means.

"LOL, you guys crack me up. Watch Loose Change, or shut up. We need a Big Banner to hang over Ground Zero that says, “JET FUEL CAN’T MELT STEEL. PERIOD.” It’s F**king Science you monkey tards. If someone wants to go ahead and show me one circumstance where they can heat burning jet fuel to a temperature that would weaken steel, please be my guest, until then, shut up." As anyone with any knowledge of engineering or science in general will be able to tell you, you don't need steel to be liquid for it to lose it's strength. The planes burned at a temperature hot enough to weaken the steel. Weak steel can't support the top of a skyscraper like normal steel can. You should try reading/watching the many, MANY videos that completely debunk loose change step by step that are made by people who know what they're talking about.

Fuck, 9/11 was pulled off by pissed off people from the middle east. Why is that so hard for some people to comprehend? Do you not get that they hate us? Or do you just think they lack the competence to pull it off? The Bush Administration did lie to us, as part of a conspiracy. That was the invasion of Iraq, not 9/11. Stop wasting your time on 9/11 and focus on Iraq.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

James — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:48:02 -0000

Someone confessed to the crime of killing Jon Benet Ramsey and it turned out NOT to be him.

Aren't the Bush family and the Bin Laden families buddies? Wasn't the Bin Laden family allowed to leave hurriedly after 9-11 from the U.S.? Weren't all of the 9-11 terrorists Saudis? Isn't the same Bush family helping Verichip plan to electronically tag every person? http://www.cnn.com/2007/TEC...

Think big picture, dudes. Perhaps 9-11 was designed to start something far more insidious than war with Iraq. Why is it that no one hears about the rest of Iraq except Baghdad?

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Zeitgeist — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:58:19 -0000

www.zeitgeistmovie.com all the answers you need. i think everyone in the world should be made to watch this movie

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:29:19 -0000

I just wrote this to the author:

Hi,

I just read your Bin Laden to 9/11 link article. An admission of guilt is NOT hard evidence, especially when it comes to these kinds of terrorist activities. If you look back you'll see that almost every time there is an attack several groups step forward to claim responsibility. Heck, you want to have some fun you can Google "several groups claimed responsibility" (put it in quotes) and see what you get.

You can also look directly at our domestic judicial system. There have been criminals in the past that have admitted guilt to a crime but because they could not link any bit of evidence to them they couldn't be prosecuted. Generally a problem occurs when the person admitting guilt can't get the story right, but we don't have Bin Laden in custody to see if he knows the fine details that only the attacker would know.

So why are we going after him at all then? Because he is a prime suspect or as the police might put it, a "person of interest." If your wife shows up dead and you skip state, you're not guilty of a crime, they may not have any evidence at all, but they'll certainly chase you down. That's really about where we're at in the whole thing, although it has certainly lost almost all steam in the last few years.

As for the media being just a bobbling head with a pre-recorded voice, we're on the same page there. That's kind of a multifaceted problem. Firstly, shocking stories create the most income for them. We all know this. However, with it being so easy to blame the government if something comes out wrong, financially there's all the incentive to just say it and none to question it. Plus it costs money to question what is being fed. Why bite the hand that feeds you? Of course we can also bring up the clear political bias of many media outlets but that's a few paragraphs on it's own. I'm sure you're already very well versed on those issues.

Anyway, I hope that really sums it up. Maybe you can 'call off the dogs' because I really don't see it as something that deserves outrage. If you want some good reading I might suggest how Bin Laden considered Saddam an "infidel" and that he was not in-fact harboring him. That being the case, why are we in Iraq at all?

Hope it helps.
J

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Jason Powell — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:25:08 -0000

If there were a conspiracy here, the wanted poster would say "for 9/11," whether they had hard evidence or not.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Chris — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:31:55 -0000

People use your brain this is just a dumb ass story, basing all your facts from an HTML page. Dont be simple minded, if you can read you can think and now think about what you just read. Does the theorist use good and solid logic? Does the writer provide you with hard facts? Because to me this is the dumbest theory yet. Dont you think if the FBI or the government was trying to cover this up that they would removed the details about the boomings in Africa and just have something like "Wanted for terrorist attacks around the world."

Thank for yourself, dont follow the guy with the biggest bullhorn.

Oh to answer your question about why this is not on the news, because it is a stupid theory. It is not even worth being called circumstantial evidence it is more like circumvented evidence.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Alistar Baker — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:50:04 -0000

Wait a second, something doesn't mesh here. In 2001, the US Government claimed Bin Laden was behind the attacks. The FBI poured more resources into the 9/11 investigation than anything prior. The UK came to the same conclusion.
Bin Laden himself admitted to his involvement in 04. Later that year Bin Laden says he trained the hijackers. They even have video of Bin Laden with some of the hijackers prior to the attacks.
So why would Tomb say there's no hard evidence? I mean we invaded Afghanistan looking for Bin Laden (among other things).
OH I see. This is all circumstantial evidence.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Morgan — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:08:33 -0000

LOL, you guys crack me up. Watch Loose Change, or shut up. We need a Big Banner to hang over Ground Zero that says, "JET FUEL CAN'T MELT STEEL. PERIOD." It's F**king Science you monkey tards. If someone wants to go ahead and show me one circumstance where they can heat burning jet fuel to a temperature that would weaken steel, please be my guest, until then, shut up.

We need MythBusters to tackle this since the 911 commission was too busy assisting in a cover up.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

independantMind — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:39:05 -0000

MR DOUBTFUL:
"I feel that Osama IS the one we need to be after. The democrats just keep coming up with pure crap to try to get back in office. That is when we will have a REAL mess. We need to remember the last democrap we had in office. What a mistake THAT one was!"

hahahahahahahahahahhaah ... wait... hahahahahaha LMAO... Clinton was a mistake? lmao the fact that you are holding your shiny new ipod and garnishing your bank account with a modicum of income is solely Clintons doing. So ... pulling his dick out is a mistake and attacking countries for oil (a giant metaphorical dick was layed to Iraq and Afghanistan) is of course never a mistake....

lmao cocaine... skull n bones... come on... clinton just wanted to bone a bitch... thats human nature... this napolean shit however.. is not.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

independent mind — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:35:54 -0000

WOW... ok.. simple test here... go to the FBI's most wanted list... and walah! our dear Mr Bin is definitely on that list... BUT.... look at what he is wanted for... any mention of 9/11 or planes or buildings? didn't think so.... come now people lets all grow up....